Re: Memory barriers and spin_unlock safety

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Gwe, 2006-03-10 at 19:19 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> PCI I/O writes are allowed to be posted by the host bus bridge (not 
> other bridges) according to the PCI 2.2 spec. Maybe no x86 platform 
> actually does this, but it's allowed, so technically a device would need 
> to do a read in order to ensure that I/O writes have arrived at the 
> device as well.

Existing Linux drivers largely believe that PCI I/O cycles as opposed to
MMIO cycles are not posted. At least one MIPS platform that did post
them ended up ensuring PCI I/O cycle posting didn't occur to get a
running Linux system - so its quite a deep assumption.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux