Hi,
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> @@ -633,11 +631,8 @@ static inline void run_hrtimer_queue(str
>
> spin_lock_irq(&base->lock);
>
> - /* Another CPU has added back the timer */
> - if (timer->state != HRTIMER_INACTIVE)
> - continue;
> -
> - if (restart != HRTIMER_NORESTART)
> + if (restart != HRTIMER_NORESTART &&
> + !hrtimer_active(timer))
> enqueue_hrtimer(timer, base);
> }
> set_curr_timer(base, NULL);
BTW the active check can be removed again, as it was added for a state
machine problem, I only didn't want to remove it for 2.6.16.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
