On Friday 10 March 2006 22:01, Måns Rullgård wrote: > Sysrq+n changes all realtime tasks to normal priority. Would the kernel's main loop (where I presume Sysreq is handled) get a chance to run with a constantly busy realtime task? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: can I bring Linux down by running "renice -20 cpu_intensive_process"?
- From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
- Re: can I bring Linux down by running "renice -20 cpu_intensive_process"?
- From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
- Re: can I bring Linux down by running "renice -20 cpu_intensive_process"?
- References:
- can I bring Linux down by running "renice -20 cpu_intensive_process"?
- From: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>
- Re: can I bring Linux down by running "renice -20 cpu_intensive_process"?
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
- Re: can I bring Linux down by running "renice -20 cpu_intensive_process"?
- From: Måns Rullgård <mru@inprovide.com>
- can I bring Linux down by running "renice -20 cpu_intensive_process"?
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] USB touch screen driver, all-in-one
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [PNP] 'modalias' sysfs export
- Previous by thread: Re: can I bring Linux down by running "renice -20 cpu_intensive_process"?
- Next by thread: Re: can I bring Linux down by running "renice -20 cpu_intensive_process"?
- Index(es):
 |