Re: [PATCH] libata: fix missing classes[] initialization in ata_bus_probe()

Tejun Heo wrote:

ata_bus_probe() didn't initialize classes[] properly with
ATA_DEV_UNKNOWN.  As ->probe_reset() is allowed to leave @classes
alone when no device is present, this results in garbage class values.
ATM, the only affected driver is ata_piix.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>

applied to #upstream


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • 2.6.16-rc5-mm3
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • ata2: dev 0 failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error) [Was: 2.6.16-rc5-mm3]
    • From: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] libata: fix missing classes[] initialization in ata_bus_probe()
    • From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Linux v2.6.16-rc6
• Next by Date: Re: PROBLEM: kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:486 - kernel 2.6.15-r1
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] libata: fix missing classes[] initialization in ata_bus_probe()
• Next by thread: Re: 2.6.16-rc5-mm3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]