On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 05:09:13PM -0800, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> until the locks needs to be upgraded or downgraded. This provides a very
> large performance increase over always asking the DLM for a new lock.
Yes, it is basically the same problem as the buffer cache. Excessive
single-use patterns dirty the small cache or require a too big cache to be
usefull.
Maybe a user specific limit of percentage of hash (and locks) used? I mean
the untar test case is a bit synthetic, but think of concurrent read access
in a cluster of nntp servers (news article pool).
Gruss
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
