Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Make _syscallX() macros compile in PIC mode on i386

Am Friday 10 March 2006 04:22 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> afaik, execve() is the only reason for retaining __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__
> support on x86.

Yes. Actually sh64 seems to be the only architecture left where
__KERNEL_SYSCALLS__ is used for something besides execve.

	Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/1] x86: Make _syscallX() macros compile in PIC mode on i386
    • From: Markus Gutschke <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Make _syscallX() macros compile in PIC mode on i386
    • From: Markus Gutschke <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Make _syscallX() macros compile in PIC mode on i386
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Document Linux's memory barriers [try #4]
• Next by Date: Router stops routing after changing MAC Address
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Make _syscallX() macros compile in PIC mode on i386 (updated patch)
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Make _syscallX() macros compile in PIC mode on i386
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]