Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Make _syscallX() macros compile in PIC mode on i386

Am Friday 10 March 2006 04:22 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> afaik, execve() is the only reason for retaining __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__
> support on x86.

Yes. Actually sh64 seems to be the only architecture left where
__KERNEL_SYSCALLS__ is used for something besides execve.

	Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 1/1] x86: Make _syscallX() macros compile in PIC mode on i386
  - From: Markus Gutschke <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Make _syscallX() macros compile in PIC mode on i386
  - From: Markus Gutschke <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Make _syscallX() macros compile in PIC mode on i386
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Document Linux's memory barriers [try #4]
Next by Date: Router stops routing after changing MAC Address
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Make _syscallX() macros compile in PIC mode on i386 (updated patch)
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Make _syscallX() macros compile in PIC mode on i386
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]