On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 09:48 -0800, Grant Grundler wrote: > My gut feeling is you want to look at SDP first. We already implement SDP. > I'm skeptical that yet another wire protocol will get > accepted into the linux kernel. It's just a simple net device driver. <b - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath driver - another round for review
- From: Grant Grundler <iod00d@hp.com>
- Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath driver - another round for review
- References:
- [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath driver - another round for review
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos@pathscale.com>
- Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath driver - another round for review
- From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@mellanox.co.il>
- Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath driver - another round for review
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos@pathscale.com>
- Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath driver - another round for review
- From: Grant Grundler <iod00d@hp.com>
- [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath driver - another round for review
- Prev by Date: Re: [rfc] Collie battery status sensing code
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] EDAC: core EDAC support code
- Previous by thread: Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath driver - another round for review
- Next by thread: Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath driver - another round for review
- Index(es):
 |