Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath driver - another round for review

On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 09:48 -0800, Grant Grundler wrote:

> My gut feeling is you want to look at SDP first.

We already implement SDP.

> I'm skeptical that yet another wire protocol will get
> accepted into the linux kernel.

It's just a simple net device driver.

	<b

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath driver - another round for review
  - From: Grant Grundler <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath driver - another round for review
  - From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath driver - another round for review
  - From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath driver - another round for review
  - From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath driver - another round for review
  - From: Grant Grundler <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [rfc] Collie battery status sensing code
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] EDAC: core EDAC support code
Previous by thread: Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath driver - another round for review
Next by thread: Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath driver - another round for review
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]