Re: [RFC PATCH] ext3 writepage() journal avoidance

[Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>]

On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 11:19 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 09:43:57AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>  > On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 00:23 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>  > > Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
>  > > >
>  > > > 
>  > > > > I'm not sure that PageMappedToDisk() gets set in all the right places
>  > > > > though - it's mainly for the `nobh' handling and block_prepare_write()
>  > > > > would need to be taught to set it.  I guess that'd be a net win, even if
>  > > > > only ext3 uses it..
>  > > > 
>  > > > btw is nobh mature enough yet to become the default, or to just go away
>  > > > entirely as option ?
>  > > 
>  > > I don't know how much usage it's had, sorry.  It's only allowed in
>  > > data=writeback mode and not many people seem to use even that.
>  > 
>  > would you be prepared to turn it on by default in -mm for a bit to see
>  > how it holds up? The concept seems valuable in itself, so much so that I
>  > feel this should be 1) on always by default when possible and 2) isn't
>  > really the kind of thing that should be a long term option; not having
>  > it almost is a -o pleaseAddThisBug option for each bug fixed.
> 
> It'd be good to get that hammered on, as it doesn't see hardly any testing
> based upon the experiments I did sometime last year.  It left me with
> an unmountable root filesystem :-/

BTW, were you doing "chattr +j" on any of the files ? (writeback, nobh
mounted filesystems ?). If so, I can see my screw ups :(

Only yesterday, I came to know about this fancy thing. I need to take
a closer look. I can't really do NOBH for this case (which currently it
does).

Thanks,
Badari

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/