On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 17:24 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > well shipping one .ko or two .ko's... same difference. Or maybe in your > case it's a 4->5 transition. No Difference from a user point of view. I think you misunderstand. The goal is for *us* to ship *none* :-) Anyway, I think we have a few different possible workable solutions that are not netlink, so I'm happy. <b - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver
- From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Revenge of the sysfs maintainer! (was Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver)
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: Revenge of the sysfs maintainer! (was Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver)
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: Revenge of the sysfs maintainer! (was Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver)
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: Revenge of the sysfs maintainer! (was Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver)
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: Revenge of the sysfs maintainer! (was Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver)
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: Revenge of the sysfs maintainer! (was Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver)
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: Revenge of the sysfs maintainer! (was Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver)
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: Revenge of the sysfs maintainer! (was Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver)
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: Revenge of the sysfs maintainer! (was Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver)
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver
- Prev by Date: RE: [Mactel-linux-devel] Re: [PATCH] /sys/firmware/efi/systab giving incorrect value for smbios
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] ext3 writepage() journal avoidance
- Previous by thread: Re: Revenge of the sysfs maintainer! (was Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver)
- Next by thread: Re: Revenge of the sysfs maintainer! (was Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver)
- Index(es):
 |