On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 17:54 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > * OpenSM wasn't usable when we wrote our SMA. We have customers
> > using ours now, so we have to support it.
>
> Presumably you mean the ib_mad SMA - OpenSM is not an SMA.
Yes, I already mentioned that I got my terms swapped in another message.
> So what do customers care which SMA
> implementation is used, as long as it formats the management packets
> correctly?
Many, perhaps most right now, of our customers don't have a full IB
stack loaded. That's why we have this small userspace SMA.
<b
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
