At 11:58 PM 3/9/2006, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: >I'd like a mechanism that is (a) always there (b) easy for kernel to use >and (c) easy for userspace to use. A sysfs file satisfies a, b, and c, >but I can't use it; a sysfs bin file satisfies all three (a bit worse on >b), but I can't use it; debugfs isn't there, so I can't use it. > >That leaves me with few options, I think. What do you suggest? (Please >don't say netlink.) mmap()? Tom. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver
- From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Revenge of the sysfs maintainer! (was Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver)
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: Revenge of the sysfs maintainer! (was Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver)
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: Revenge of the sysfs maintainer! (was Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver)
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: Revenge of the sysfs maintainer! (was Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver)
- From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver
- Prev by Date: Re: Revenge of the sysfs maintainer! (was Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver)
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/03] Unmapped: Separate unmapped and mapped pages
- Previous by thread: Re: Revenge of the sysfs maintainer! (was Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver)
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver
- Index(es):
 |