Re: [Ocfs2-devel] Ocfs2 performance bugs of doom

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:26:09PM -0800, Daniel Phillips wrote:
A poor distribution as you already noticed[1].

How did you decide that?

I looked at it and jumped to the wrong conclusion :-)

When I actually simulated it I found that the distribution is in fact
not much different from what I get from rand.  So much for trying to
pin the blame on the hash function.  Next lets try to pin the blame
on vmalloc.  (Spoiler: it's not vmalloc's fault either.)

Regards,

Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux