Re: [PATCH 03/03] Unmapped: Add guarantee code

["Magnus Damm" <magnus.damm@gmail.com>]

On 3/10/06, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> Magnus Damm wrote:
> > Implement per-LRU guarantee through sysctl.
> >
> > This patch introduces the two new sysctl files "node_mapped_guar" and
> > "node_unmapped_guar". Each file contains one percentage per node and tells
> > the system how many percentage of all pages that should be kept in RAM as
> > unmapped or mapped pages.
> >
>
> The whole Linux VM philosophy until now has been to get away from stuff
> like this.

Yeah, and Linux has never supported memory resource control either, right?

> If your app is really that specialised then maybe it can use mlock. If
> not, maybe the VM is currently broken.
>
> You do have a real-world workload that is significantly improved by this,
> right?

Not really, but I think there is a demand for memory resource control today.

The memory controller in ckrm also breaks out the LRU, but puts one
LRU instance in each class. My code does not depend on ckrm, but it
should be possible to have some kind of resource control with this
patch and cpusets. And yeah, add numa emulation if you are out of
nodes. =)

Thanks,

/ magnus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/