From: Dmitry Mishin <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 13:23:59 +0300
> Hello, Arnd!
>
> > For the compat_ioctl stuff, we don't have the function pointer inside an
> > #ifdef, the overhead is relatively small since there is only one of these
> > structures per module implementing a protocol, but it avoids having to
> > rebuild everything when changing CONFIG_COMPAT.
> >
> > It's probably not a big issue either way, maybe davem has a stronger
> > opinion on it either way.
> >
> Done.
I think this looks fine but it doesn't apply cleanly to the
current net-2.6.17 tree.
Could you cook up a fresh patch, and send it with a complete
changelog entry and appropriate Signed-off-by: lines?
Thanks a lot Dmitry.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
