> + if (dd->ipath_unit >= atomic_read(&ipath_max))
> + atomic_set(&ipath_max, dd->ipath_unit + 1);
If this is the way you use ipath_max, why is it an atomic variable? I
can't find any uses of ipath_max that don't look racy if the only
thing protecting it is the fact that it's an atomic_t, and if it has
some other protection, then I don't think it needs to be atomic.
- R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
