On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 15:10 -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > The difference between our 2.6.15 386 and 686 kernels is actually pretty > huge. The 386 is M486, and UP, while our 686 kernel is M686, and SMP. > The SMP is also complicated by our use of the SMP-alternatives patch, > but I believe I had this user test with this disabled (kernel command > line option that leaves all the SMP code intact for testing). It didn't > alter the problem. Ubuntu doesn't provide a UP 686 kernel? Isn't there a performance hit running an SMP kernel on UP? Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: State of the Linux PCI and PCI Hotplug Subsystems for 2.6.16-rc5
- From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
- SMP on UP (Was Re: State of the Linux PCI and PCI Hotplug Subsystems for 2.6.16-rc5)
- From: Ben Collins <[email protected]>
- Re: State of the Linux PCI and PCI Hotplug Subsystems for 2.6.16-rc5
- References:
- State of the Linux PCI and PCI Hotplug Subsystems for 2.6.16-rc5
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: State of the Linux PCI and PCI Hotplug Subsystems for 2.6.16-rc5
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: State of the Linux PCI and PCI Hotplug Subsystems for 2.6.16-rc5
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: State of the Linux PCI and PCI Hotplug Subsystems for 2.6.16-rc5
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: State of the Linux PCI and PCI Hotplug Subsystems for 2.6.16-rc5
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: State of the Linux PCI and PCI Hotplug Subsystems for 2.6.16-rc5
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: State of the Linux PCI and PCI Hotplug Subsystems for 2.6.16-rc5
- From: Tomasz Torcz <[email protected]>
- Re: State of the Linux PCI and PCI Hotplug Subsystems for 2.6.16-rc5
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: State of the Linux PCI and PCI Hotplug Subsystems for 2.6.16-rc5
- From: Ben Collins <[email protected]>
- State of the Linux PCI and PCI Hotplug Subsystems for 2.6.16-rc5
- Prev by Date: Re: [Suspend2-announce] Nigel's work and the future of Suspend2.
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ext3: ext3_symlink should use GFP_NOFS allocations inside
- Previous by thread: Re: State of the Linux PCI and PCI Hotplug Subsystems for 2.6.16-rc5
- Next by thread: SMP on UP (Was Re: State of the Linux PCI and PCI Hotplug Subsystems for 2.6.16-rc5)
- Index(es):
 |