On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 12:07 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > About half of the ~50 reports I've looked at so far in their database
> > have been false positives. In most of those cases, it's not obvious how
> > a checker might have gotten them right instead, though.
>
> It seems to stumble quite a bit when faced with things that are
> free'd when refcounts drop to zero. (skbs, and kobjects).
Yes, or (in my case) stuff like "when this variable has value X, that
pointer can't possibly be NULL".
<b
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]