Luke-Jr wrote:
Or Linux can remain GPL'd, which prohibits binary drivers *legally*, and back
this by keeping a non-stable API which prohibits binary drivers
*technically*.
If binary drivers are illegal, then why have ATI and nvidia not been
sued yet?
Interacting with the kernel does not make your software a derived work.
A derived work is if you make your own kernel that is very close to a
straight copy of the Linux kernel. The right to create new works that
interact with others ( and therefore, require some understanding of how
the other work operates ) is specifically protected by the US copyright
act.
This is why it is legal to reverse engineer a binary driver to gain an
understanding of how the hardware operates, publish that information,
and then use that information to create new software to operate that
hardware.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
