"Eric W. Biederman" wrote:
>
> struct pid
> {
> + atomic_t count;
> /* Try to keep pid_chain in the same cacheline as nr for find_pid */
> int nr;
> struct hlist_node pid_chain;
> /* list of pids with the same nr, only one of them is in the hash */
> - struct list_head pid_list;
> - /* Does a weak reference of this type exist to the task struct? */
> - struct task_ref *tref;
> + struct list_head tasks[PIDTYPE_MAX];
> + struct rcu_head rcu;
> };
>
> ...
>
> +static void rcu_put_pid(struct rcu_head *rhp)
> +{
> + struct pid *pid = container_of(rhp, struct pid, rcu);
> + put_pid(pid);
> +}
I hope we can do it without pid->rcu and rcu_put_pid(). Hopefuly
we can use SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU. To do so we need some changes in
find_task_by_pid_type().
I'll try to look closer at this patch tomorrow.
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
