On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 09:36:04PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
> On 3/7/06, Jack Steiner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > - cache_estimate(0, cache_cache.buffer_size, cache_line_size(), 0,
> > - &left_over, &cache_cache.num);
> > + for (order = 0; order < MAX_ORDER; order++) {
> > + cache_estimate(order, cache_cache.buffer_size, cache_line_size(), 0,
> > + &left_over, &cache_cache.num);
> > + if (cache_cache.num)
> > + break;
> > + }
>
> Any reason why you can't use calculate_slab_order() here?
>
> Pekka
I think either will work & the amount of code is about the same.
I chose the above because it was easier to see that change had no effect
on existing platforms.
Does anyone see a compelling reason for a different but equivalent implementation??
---
Jack
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
