"Eric W. Biederman" wrote:
>
> Unless we can implement do_each_task_pid/while_each_task_pid in terms
> of for_each_task_pid. I am nervous about making the conversion.
Yes, of course. Currently I have:
#define for_each_task_pid(head, who, type, task) \
if ((head = find_pid(who))) \
list_for_each_entry(task, ((head)->tasks + type), pids[type])
// OBSOLETE
#define do_each_task_pid(who, type, task) \
do { \
struct pid_head * __pid_head__; \
for_each_task_pid(__pid_head__, who, type, task) {
#define while_each_task_pid(who, type, task) \
} \
} while (0)
It's better not to change the users of do_each_task_pid() for some
time at least.
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
