Andrew wrote:
> That's OK - it's -ENODEV.
I can't help but wonder if the particular case of -ENODEV should
be kept quiet, as in the following totally untested patch:
diff -Naurp 2.6.16-rc5-mm2.orig/init/main.c 2.6.16-rc5-mm2/init/main.c
--- 2.6.16-rc5-mm2.orig/init/main.c 2006-03-06 17:02:46.491860190 -0800
+++ 2.6.16-rc5-mm2/init/main.c 2006-03-06 17:07:29.754830844 -0800
@@ -608,7 +608,8 @@ static void __init do_initcalls(void)
result = (*call)();
- if (result) {
+ /* don't mind -ENODEV - just a driver w/o hardware */
+ if (result && result != -ENODEV) {
sprintf(msgbuf, "error code %d", result);
msg = msgbuf;
}
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
