On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Either revert it, or try this (TOTALLY UNTESTED!!!) patch..
Don't even bother with the untested patch.
> + for (gfporder = 0 ; gfporder < MAX_GFP_ORDER; gfporder++) {
At a minimum, this "<" needs to be "<=".
After that, it might even work. Not that I can convince me that the test
for "offslab_limit" ever even triggers, so..
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2
- From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>
- Re: Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2
- References:
- Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2
- From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
- Re: Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2
- From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
- Re: Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2
- From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>
- Re: Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2
- From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>
- Re: Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2
- From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>
- Re: Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2
- Prev by Date: Re: Status of AIO
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] EDAC: core EDAC support code
- Previous by thread: Re: Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2
- Next by thread: Re: Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2
- Index(es):
 |