Re: cache_reap(): Further reduction in interrupt holdoff

On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> Touched processing worries me little because it's used when there's
> high allocation pressure. Do you have any numbers where this patch
> helps?

We had frequent holdoffs >30usec in cache_reap() without this patch. Now 
it happens once in awhile.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- cache_reap(): Further reduction in interrupt holdoff
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: cache_reap(): Further reduction in interrupt holdoff
  - From: "Pekka Enberg" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Is that an acceptable interface change?
Next by Date: Re: sysctls inside containers
Previous by thread: Re: cache_reap(): Further reduction in interrupt holdoff
Next by thread: [PATCH 0/6] dm/md sysfs dependency tree (rev.3)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]