Re: Is that an acceptable interface change?

On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 04:55:02PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> Userspace apps should not include kernel headers, period.
> So, userspace applications really shouldn't care.

Please excuse me if I'm a little dense here, but the kernel headers
_define_ the userspace-kernel interface.  If you don't have them or a
sanitized copy of them you just can't talk with the kernel at all.

  OG.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is that an acceptable interface change?
  - From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: Is that an acceptable interface change?
  - From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
- Re: Is that an acceptable interface change?
  - From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>

References:
- Is that an acceptable interface change?
  - From: Olivier Galibert <[email protected]>
- Re: Is that an acceptable interface change?
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: Is that an acceptable interface change?
  - From: Olivier Galibert <[email protected]>
- Re: Is that an acceptable interface change?
  - From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Problem on Alpha with "convert to generic irq framework"
Next by Date: Re: + s390-add-modalias-to-uevent-for-ccw-devices.patch added to -mm tree
Previous by thread: Re: Is that an acceptable interface change?
Next by thread: Re: Is that an acceptable interface change?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]