Stefan Rompf wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Am Sonntag 05 März 2006 09:34 schrieb Andrew Morton:
>
>
>
>>That check was changed from
>>
>> "If this STA doesn't use WPA and that AP does, then bale"
>>
>>into
>>
>> "If this STA does use WPA and that AP doesn't then bale".
>>
>>So a theory would be that your AP isn't filling in those WPA length fields.
>>I see no reason why we should permit that to disable WEP?
>>
>>
>
>problem is that wpa_supplicant needs to set wpa_enabled unconditionally, so
>with this change it hasn't been possible to connect to non-WPA networks
>using WPA supplicant. For the discussion on the IPW list, see
>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=114004412300002&r=1&w=2 .
>
>1.0.12 fixes this by removing the check entirely. James: Does it makes sense
>for you to push 1.1.0 out to netdev soon, or better just the fix for this?
>
>
We'll gather up all the patches that have accumulated out of tree that
are not already in John's tree and get them sent to netdev today.
Thanks,
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
