Re: [PATCH 0/5] Permit NFS superblock sharing [try #3]

Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:

> The same happens with just #1 and #2 applied.  The .config is at
> http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/config-vmm.

Just #1 and #2? That's decidedly odd.

Also odd is that it's _nfsd_ that's affected, not nfs. It also affects
binfmt_misc, so it appears that it's something to do with get_sb_single(), and
looking at that function, I can sort of see why it might be. I'll look into it further.

> The kernel won't compile with just patch #1 applied.  Patches shouldn't go
> into git in that manner.

It's easier to review them in that manner. If you don't think git is up to it,
then combine them.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/5] Permit NFS superblock sharing [try #3]
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/5] Permit NFS superblock sharing [try #3]
    • From: Jörn Engel <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/5] Permit NFS superblock sharing [try #3]
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 0/5] Permit NFS superblock sharing [try #3]
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Busy inodes after unmount, be more verbose in generic_shutdown_super
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Busy inodes after unmount, be more verbose in generic_shutdown_super
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Permit NFS superblock sharing [try #3]
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Permit NFS superblock sharing [try #3]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]