Andrew Morton wrote: > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.16-rc5/2.6.16-rc5-mm2/broken-out/x86_64-mm-blk-bounce.patch. > Could you test that? (and don't alter the Cc: list!). The patch is > against 2.6.16-rc5. I forgot to mention that the DVD drive was not automatically recognized: ata1: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x1F0 ctl 0x3F6 bmdma 0x18F0 irq 14 ata1: dev 0 cfg 49:0f00 82:0218 83:4000 84:4000 85:0218 86:0000 87:4000 88:041f ata1: dev 0 ATAPI, max UDMA/66 ata1: dev 0 configured for UDMA/33 scsi0 : ata_piix ata1(0): WARNING: ATAPI is disabled, device ignored. Is this still as described in http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Problems_with_SATA_and_Linux under "DVD drive not recognized"? Perhaps I'll be able to do some tests on that later, too. Best regards J Esteves -- +351 939838775 Skype:jmcerqueira http://del.icio.us/jmce
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
- References:
- oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.12 on EM64T
- From: J M Cerqueira Esteves <[email protected]>
- Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.12 on EM64T
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.12 on EM64T
- From: J M Cerqueira Esteves <[email protected]>
- oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
- From: J M Cerqueira Esteves <[email protected]>
- Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.12 on EM64T
- Prev by Date: Re: Fw: Re: oops in choose_configuration()
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] bsg, block layer sg
- Previous by thread: Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
- Next by thread: Re: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1 with 2.6.15.4 on EM64T [previously 2.6.12]
- Index(es):