Re: [OT] inotify hack for locate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/5/06, Chris Ball <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On 5 Mar 2006 21:36:19, Jon Masters <[email protected]> said:
>
>    > I'm fed up with those finds running whenever I power on. Has
>    > anyone written an equivalent of the Microsoft indexing service to
>    > update locate's database?

> I think the reason this hasn't been done is that inotify_add_watch()es
> are non-recursive:  you'd need a watch over every directory, and you'd
> need a crawling step (churn, churn) to enumerate the directories to
> add watches for.

You're right. What I want really is to be able to bind to a netlink
socket and get told about particular file IO operations I'm interested
in for the /whole/ of a filesystem. The same kind of thing that real
time anti-virus/anti-spam people want to do anyway.

Thanks for the links, Chris. I've not been following Beagle
development (lost interest after the OLS talk got cancelled) very
closely so wasn't aware of the current implementation.

Jon.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux