jamal wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-04-03 at 17:56 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>>Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>
>>>This option should IMHO no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL.
>>>
>>
>>Yesterday I managed to crash my machine playing around with tc actions
>>within minutes. I haven't looked into it yet, but it seems it still
>>needs more testing.
>
>
> Simple: Fix the bug and submit a patch. If you cant find the cause post
> what you are doing.
I'll fix it.
> What is the metric for going from experimental to non-experimental?
> I surely hope it doesnt come to some irrational reasoning like
> "Patrick found a bug"[1].
I think a sane metric is "opinion of people who know the code". But
I don't care much, I don't think many people care whether something
is maked experimental or not.
> [1]If you used half of that logic on netfilter it would still be
> experimental or rather should be demoted to experimental.
I'll take that as a compliment :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
