Re: [PATCH 7/5] Optimise d_find_alias()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 03:45:52AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> David Howells <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >  struct dentry * d_find_alias(struct inode *inode)
> >   {
> >  -	struct dentry *de;
> >  -	spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
> >  -	de = __d_find_alias(inode, 0);
> >  -	spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
> >  +	struct dentry *de = NULL;
> >  +	if (!list_empty(&inode->i_dentry)) {
> >  +		spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
> >  +		de = __d_find_alias(inode, 0);
> >  +		spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
> >  +	}
> >   	return de;
> >   }
> 
> How can we get away without a barrier?

What would it buy you?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux