> On Thu, Mar 02 2006, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 March 2006 12:10, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> > > I'm waiting for Andi to render an opinion on the problem.
> It should have
> > > no corruption implications, the PIO path will handle
> arbitrarily large
> > > requests. I'm assuming the mapped sg table is correct,
> just odd looking
> > > for some reason.
> >
> > I was waiting for feedback if iommu=nomerge changes
> anything. With that option
> > the IOMMU code will never touch the layout of the sg list,
> just rewrite
> > ->dma_address
>
> Andy already reported that it didn't change anything. The
> output doesn't
> looked merged anyways in most of the cases, it's the offsetting that
> looks odd.
>
Indeed I did: <http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/3/1/109>
--
Andy, BlueArc Engineering
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
