Jeff Garzik wrote:
Mark Lord wrote:Jeff Garzik wrote: ..Sounds like un-blacklisting the drive, and adding ATA_FLAG_NO_FUA is the way to go...Might as well add sata_mv to that blacklist as well.Have you confirmed that it doesn't work with FUA?
Ooops. Defective memory here. The Marvell documentation for the 6081/6041 does indeed state that the FUA DMA commands *are* supported (queued or non-queued). So it should be okay, at least for those two specific chips. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- From: Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- From: Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- From: "Eric D. Mudama" <[email protected]>
- FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- From: "Eric D. Mudama" <[email protected]>
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- From: "Eric D. Mudama" <[email protected]>
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] reiserfs: reiserfs_file_write will lose error code when a 0-length write occurs w/ O_SYNC
- Next by Date: 2.6.16-rc5-mm1 memory-hotplug compile fix
- Previous by thread: Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- Next by thread: Re: FUA and 311x (was Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4)
- Index(es):
 |