Re: [PATCH] Add O_NONBLOCK support to FUSE

> Found the BUG, patch below.  Feel free to merge it with the async
> patch even though it is signed off on its own.

OK.

And I think the 'fc->fasync = NULL' is redundant, since
fasync_helper() should have already set it to NULL (fc->fasync list
will contain at most one item).

Committed both changes.

Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Add O_NONBLOCK support to FUSE
    • From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Add O_NONBLOCK support to FUSE
    • From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Add O_NONBLOCK support to FUSE
    • From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Fwd: [PATCH 3/5] NFS: Abstract out namespace initialisation [try #2]]
• Next by Date: Re: [Fwd: [PATCH 3/5] NFS: Abstract out namespace initialisation [try #2]]
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Add O_NONBLOCK support to FUSE
• Next by thread: [Patch] Move swiotlb_init early on X86_64
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]