On 3/2/06, Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thursday 02 March 2006 19:16, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>
> > Andi, Christoph : would this make sense as a fix for -stable ?
>
> It's already fixed in stable.
>
Hmm, ok, so it's in the queue for 2.6.15.6 (since it obviously isn't
in current 2.6.15.5 -stable as that's where Steffen hit it), that's
good.
> > How about mainline ?
>
> mainline never had this problem. The backport was just bad.
>
Hmm, I see that at least two things from the patch seems to be
aplicable to at least current -mm (haven't checked latest Linus -git
yet).
The bit that removes BITS_PER_BYTE from
arch/i386/mach-voyager/voyager_cat.c and the bit that removes the
duplicate #include <linux/mempolicy.h> and substitutes it with
#include <linux/types.h> those bits would seem to apply to
2.6.16-rc5-mm1
include/linux/types.h already has the BITSPER_BYTE define in -mm.
--
Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
