Re: Another compile problem with 2.6.15.5 on AMD64

["Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>]

On 3/2/06, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
> On Thursday 02 March 2006 19:16, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>
> > Andi, Christoph : would this make sense as a fix for -stable ?
>
> It's already fixed in stable.
>

Hmm, ok, so it's in the queue for 2.6.15.6 (since it obviously isn't
in current 2.6.15.5 -stable as that's where Steffen hit it), that's
good.

> > How about mainline ?
>
> mainline never had this problem. The backport was just bad.
>

Hmm, I see that at least two things from the patch seems to be
aplicable to at least current -mm (haven't checked latest Linus -git
yet).
The bit that removes BITS_PER_BYTE from
arch/i386/mach-voyager/voyager_cat.c and the bit that removes the
duplicate #include <linux/mempolicy.h> and substitutes it with
#include <linux/types.h>  those bits would seem to apply to
2.6.16-rc5-mm1

include/linux/types.h already has the BITSPER_BYTE define in -mm.


--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/