s_vfs_rename_sem and cifs (was Re: Possible deadlock in vfs layer, namei.c)

On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 06:46:42PM -0800, Joshua Hudson wrote:
> from namei.c (function: lock_rename), rename takes:
> 1. s_vfs_rename_sem,

Speaking of s_vfs_rename_sem, does cifs usage of it despite explicit
warning at fs.h
was found to be legal?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: s_vfs_rename_sem and cifs (was Re: Possible deadlock in vfs layer, namei.c)
  - From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Permit NFS superblock sharing [try #2]
Next by Date: Re: [Pcihpd-discuss] Re: [patch 2/3] acpiphp: add dock event handling
Previous by thread: [PATCH] bsg, block layer sg
Next by thread: Re: s_vfs_rename_sem and cifs (was Re: Possible deadlock in vfs layer, namei.c)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]