Re: [Fwd: [PATCH 3/5] NFS: Abstract out namespace initialisation [try #2]]

Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> wrote:

> > The attached patch abstracts out the namespace initialisation so that 
> > temporary namespaces can be set up elsewhere.
> 
> Definitily shouldb't be inline.  And until you have a second caller
> it's utterly pointless.  So NACK for now.

I presume from that you didn't notice that the second caller was in patch 5/5?

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Fwd: [PATCH 3/5] NFS: Abstract out namespace initialisation [try #2]]
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Fwd: [PATCH 3/5] NFS: Abstract out namespace initialisation [try #2]]
    • From: Sam Vilain <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [Fwd: [PATCH 3/5] NFS: Abstract out namespace initialisation [try #2]]
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
  • [Fwd: [PATCH 3/5] NFS: Abstract out namespace initialisation [try #2]]
    • From: Sam Vilain <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] pcmcia: add another ide-cs CF card id
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] pcmcia: add another ide-cs CF card id
• Previous by thread: Re: [Fwd: [PATCH 3/5] NFS: Abstract out namespace initialisation [try #2]]
• Next by thread: Re: [Fwd: [PATCH 3/5] NFS: Abstract out namespace initialisation [try #2]]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]