Martin Bligh writes:
> He's removing KERN_ALERT ... I guess it could get switched from
> KERN_ALERT to KERN_ERR, but ...
>
> Either way, KERN_ALERT seems way too low to me. I object to getting
> half the oops, and not the other half ;-)
KERN_ALERT is two steps higher in priority (lower number) than
KERN_ERR. Why on earth would we see KERN_ERR messages but not
KERN_ALERT messages?
In fact die() should probably be using KERN_EMERG.
Messages without a loglevel are by default logged at KERN_WARNING
level, one step lower in priority than KERN_ERR.
This all sounds to me like there is something wacky going on
somewhere, and we need to get to the bottom of it rather than just
remove printk tags.
Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
