Re: 2.6.16rc5 'found' an extra CPU.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:38:31AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
 > 
 > > ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x00] enabled)
 > > Processor #0 15:5 APIC version 16
 > > ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x02] lapic_id[0x01] enabled)
 > > Processor #1 15:5 APIC version 16
 > > ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x03] lapic_id[0x82] disabled)
 > > ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x04] lapic_id[0x83] disabled)
 > 
 > It's because of the two disabled CPUs. We decreed at some point
 > that disabled CPUs mean hotpluggable CPUs. But it's doing
 > this for some time so you probably only noticed now.

*boggle*, there really are only two single-core CPUs in there,
with no empty sockets. It's an early stepping of the motherboard
too that supposedly doesn't support dual-core.  So why these are present
at all, let alone 'disabled' is a mystery to me.

logrotate ate the old logs, so I don't have any old bootlogs
to grep through, but I'll take your word for it :)

Why ACPI decides to create 3 processor entries is still odd though.

		Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux