Re: 2.6.16rc5 'found' an extra CPU.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 07:55:25PM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
 > In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
 > 
 > On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 18:03:17, Dave Jones wrote:
 > 
 > > (17:59:38:davej@nemesis:~)$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology/core_siblings
 > > 00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000001
 > > (17:59:47:davej@nemesis:~)$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/topology/core_siblings
 > > 00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000002
 > > 
 > > Neither of these CPUs are HT / dual-core, so shouldn't these be the same ?
 > 
 > Those are bitmaps. 1 => only bit 0 is set => CPU 0 is all alone.
 > 
 > Did you really build a 256-CPU SMP kernel or is ACPI ignoring CONFIG_NR_CPUS
 > or something?

Yes, it's =256.

		Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux