On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 10:42:35PM +0100, Ren? Rebe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday 01 March 2006 22:32, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 09:16:25PM +0100, Ren?? Rebe wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I wonder if:
> > >
> > > drivers/usb/core/devio.c:86
> > > #define MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE 16384
> > >
> > > is some random, or outdated limit or if there really is some code path that could
> > > not handle bigger URBs.
> > >
> > > For performance reasons I would like to use bigger packages for an image
> > > aquisition device.
> >
> > Why not just send down 2 urbs with that size then, that would keep the
> > pipe quite full.
>
> Because that requires even more modifications to libusb and sane (i_usb) ...
No, do it in your application I mean.
> So, queing alot URBs is the recommended way to sustain the bus? Allowing
> way bigger buffers will not be realistic?
16Kb is "way big" in the USB scheme of things aready. Look at the size
of your endpoint. It's probably _very_ small compared to that. So no,
larger buffer sizes is not realistic at all.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
