Re: 2.6.16-rc5-mm1

[Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>]

Andrew Morton wrote:

> Maybe you're not running applications which install inotify watches.  This
> is apparently triggerable by doing `touch foo;rm foo;touch foo' in a watched
> directory.
>
> Nick, isn't it simply a matter of..
>
> --- devel/fs/dcache.c~inotify-lock-avoidance-with-parent-watch-status-in-dentry-fix	2006-03-01 12:10:48.000000000 -0800
> +++ devel-akpm/fs/dcache.c	2006-03-01 12:11:33.000000000 -0800
> @@ -173,6 +173,7 @@ repeat:
> 		goto kill_it;
>   	if (list_empty(&dentry->d_lru)) {
>   		dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_REFERENCED;
> +		dentry->d_flags &= DCACHE_INOTIFY_PARENT_WATCHED;
>   		list_add(&dentry->d_lru, &dentry_unused);
>   		dentry_stat.nr_unused++;
>   	}
> _
>
> -

This doesn;t look quite corect to me.  First set DCACHE_REFERENCED in
the d_flags and then clear every bit in d_flags except
DCACHE_INOTIFY_PARENT_WATCHED?  Should this be 
"~DCACHE_INOTIFY_PARENT_WATCHED"?

   Thanx...

      ps
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/