On Wednesday 01 March 2006 19:07, Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote:
> Mar 1 11:39:27 ti94 kernel: time.c: Lost 1 timer tick(s)! rip __do_softirq+0x55/0xd4)
Yes, I bet something forgets to turn on interrupts again and it's picked up by
(and blamed on) the next guy who does an unconditional sti, which happens to be __do_sofitrq
or idle.
> Time to instrument sata_nv, I suppose. Many thanks for helping to narrow this
> down.
Sprinkle WARN_ON(in_interrupt()) all over the parts that shouldn't have interrupts
off.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
