Re: jiffies_64 vs. jiffies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 23:52:37 +1100, Nick Piggin <[email protected]> said:

>> void do_timer(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> {
>> -	jiffies_64++;
>> -	update_times();
>> +	update_times(++jiffies_64);
>>  	softlockup_tick(regs);
>> }

nick> jiffies_64 is not volatile so you should not have to obfuscate
nick> the code like this.

Well, do you mean it should be like this ?

	jiffies_64++;
	update_times(jiffies_64);

Thanks for your comments.
---
Atsushi Nemoto
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux