Re: [PATCH -rt] buggy UART fix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 21:40 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> hm, i just got the deadlock below, most likely due to your serial fix.  
> (never got this before) It's not 100% reproducible - booted the kernel a 
> dozen times (with your patch applied, working on other stuff) before i 
> got this deadlock.

The original patch grabs the port.lock and then
calls serial8250_handle_port() which grabs the lock
again. Just remove the spin_lock/spin_unlock below.

+ /*
+ * If we have a buggy TX line, that doesn't
+ * notify us via iir that we need to transmit
+ * then force the call.
+ */
+ if (!handled && (up->bugs & UART_BUG_TXEN)) {
+ spin_lock(&up->port.lock);
+ serial8250_handle_port(up, regs);
+ spin_unlock(&up->port.lock);
+ }

-- 
Paul Fulghum
Microgate Systems, Ltd

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux