Nick Piggin wrote:
Patch seems to work, might want more testing.
It probably should not be applied without a discussion, especially
as no filesystem in kernel tree wants this. I am working on a fs that does.
This is backwards I think. This is not disallowed because there are
no filesystems that want it. Linux doesn't want it so it is disallowed
by the vfs.
> You have to put forward a case for why we want it, rather than show us
> your filesystem that "wants" it. Right?
Agreed. Mostly this is because the design of unix directory semantics
preclude it from being possible. You have exactly one ".." entry. More
than one ".." would mean confusion (which does ".." refer to?). A
different name would confuse more programs.
The VFS is presenting collections of arbitrary filesystems as unix
filesystem, it is not a generic abstraction for any kind of storage
system that is extended to encompass novel approaches to filesystem
structure.
So if you wanted to access such a filesystem via Linux you would need to
present this non-unix idea of directory hard links through some kind of
ioctl etc.
Besides, we already have bind mounts, which are in many ways like a
directory hard link (and, in many other ways, unlike one).
Sam.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]