Re: libata PATA patch for 2.6.16-rc5

On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:49:49AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the report. The PDC20268 and 2027x are driven by Albert Lee's
> Promise driver which should end up in the main tree soon, probably
> before my PATA bits. 
> 

That's weird, pata_pdc2027x.c is in the -rc5 tree, or at least after
applying your -ide1 patch, but the references in Kconfig and Makefile
are missing. Is this intentional? I'll try and scribble something up,
diff is about to follow.

Thanks for the pointer!

Chris

Attachment: pgpYa3GbDHll8.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• References:
  • libata PATA patch for 2.6.16-rc5
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: libata PATA patch for 2.6.16-rc5
    • From: Christian Trefzer <[email protected]>
  • Re: libata PATA patch for 2.6.16-rc5
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Linux v2.6.16-rc5 - regression
• Next by Date: RE: adding swap workarounds oom - was: Re: Out of Memory: Killed process 16498 (java).
• Previous by thread: Re: libata PATA patch for 2.6.16-rc5
• Next by thread: [PATCH] Add pata_pdc_2ß27x to Kconfig and Makefile (was: Re: libata PATA patch for 2.6.16-rc5)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]