On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 12:58:02AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sad, 2006-02-25 at 08:41 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > the regualatory problems are not true.
>
> They are although the binary interpretation isn't AFAIK from law but
> from lawyers. The same is actually true in much of the EU. The actual
> requirement is that the transmitting device must be reasonably
> tamperproof. Some of the lawyers have decided that for a software radio
> tamperproof means "binary".
Exactly. There's no strong requirement, it's just over-zealous corporate
lawyers. That's why we need to push Intel strongly here.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
