Re: [Lse-tech] [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats

On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 03:12 -0500, Shailabh Nagar wrote:

> Add sysctl option for controlling schedstats collection
> dynamically. Delay accounting leverages schedstats for
> cpu delay statistics.

Is there some reason you're using the sysctl interface, and not say
sysfs instead?

	<b

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Lse-tech] [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [Patch 0/7] Per-task delay accounting
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
  • [Patch 1/7] timespec diff utility
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
  • [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.4.31 hangs, no information on console or serial port
• Next by Date: Re: [uml-devel] [Announce] mountlo 0.5 - Loopback mounting in userspace
• Previous by thread: schedstats refinement (was Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats)
• Next by thread: Re: [Lse-tech] [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]