On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 17:59 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > > your sysctl functions sleep. the BKL is useless in the light of sleeping > > code... > > > > But wouldn't all sysctls potentially sleep (on account of copying data from > the user). .. I'm not the one saying the BKL was useful... you were ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
- From: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
- References:
- [Patch 0/7] Per-task delay accounting
- From: Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com>
- [Patch 1/7] timespec diff utility
- From: Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com>
- [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
- From: Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com>
- Re: [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
- From: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
- From: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
- [Patch 0/7] Per-task delay accounting
- Prev by Date: problems with scsi_transport_fc and qla2xxx
- Next by Date: Re: [Announce] Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection
- Previous by thread: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
- Next by thread: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
- Index(es):
 |